Act A - The Market Structure
The expert witness market is an elite, opaque network operating largely on rumor. If an agricultural drone crashes into a commercial airliner, the lawyers need an expert in drone aviation physics. Because there is no central mechanism translating academic capability into legal utility, the same five 'professional experts' are used repeatedly, risking judicial fatigue, while the actual world-leading expert sits quietly in a university lab, entirely unknown to the legal community.
Act B - The Story
Julian is litigating a $50 million lawsuit regarding a collapsed suspension bridge. He needs a structural metallurgist, but the only two experts in his firm's database have already been retained by the defense.
Dr. Aris is a professor researching exactly the type of microscopic steel fatigue that caused the collapse, but he has never testified in court and no lawyer knows he exists.
Julian queries the platform for the specific fracture mechanics involved. The algorithm scours Canadian technical DOIs and surfaces Dr. Aris. Critically, the platform also provides Julian with an interface to execute a secure, conflict-free retainer agreement. Dr. Aris provides devastatingly precise testimony that the generic 'professional experts' cannot refute, securing a massive settlement for Julian's client.
Act C - Why This Market Stays Broken Without Infrastructure
Finding an expert is fundamentally an ontological matching problem: translating a legal question into a scientific taxonomy. DeeperPoint builds the bridge between the law and academia, turning isolated theoretical brilliance into high-impact applied legal evidence.
Characters are fictional. The difficulty of sourcing technical experts is real. DeeperPoint is building the infrastructure this story describes.